annerb: (Miss Bingley)
annerb ([personal profile] annerb) wrote2009-12-20 05:43 pm
Entry tags:

Saw Avatar...

Well, I guess I'm mostly just disappointed or unimpressed. I mean, don't get me wrong, the movie was gorgeous, it just left me with an unsettled feeling. I mean, it's basically Dances with Wolves in Space, with a slightly less depressing (and way more unbelievable) ending. (Seriously, the two humans who stayed behind? Uh...they can't breathe the air, let alone, I dunno, procreate? Lol.)

I guess my biggest problem is twofold: 1) So Predictable. and 2) Nothing But Stereotypes.

I mean, I think you're possibly overburdening your "symbolism" and "themes" when you use well-known Native American actors to voice the primitive, naked, nature-loving alien species. (And don't get me started on the fetishization and over-idealization of the aliens themselves. Western, white-man fantasy perchance? Insanely thin, athletic, noble savage willing to fall in love and mate with you!) Is this movie really anything more than revisionist, apologetic rewriting of history? In SPACE!

Not  single character at any point surprised me or showed any secondary depth. I guess Signorny Weaver's character would come closest. And obviously the hard-ass military commander is the worst caricature of all. And the main guy was a pretty good actor, he's just a character I've seen so many damn times that it's boring. (Come on, admit it, the second the Last Shadow thing or whatever was mentioned, you KNEW he would be the one to re-unite the clans.Thank you, white man. We couldn't have done it without you.)

And just once, I would love to see the technology vs. tree-huggers dichotmy be a little less black and white, a little less unbalanced. This planet they first depict at the beginning as being insanely deadly has nothing to fight back against metal and guns? Really? And I'm not talking about a raging pack of super-dinos or whatever. If you are going to touch on the comparison of the religion of technology vs. the religion of symbiosis, why be so scared to touch on the non-traditional? The spiritual? The UNEXPECTED?

Wow, I was not quite as apathetic as I thought at first. The more I think about this film, the less impressed I am. I mean, it wasn't even bad. It was just...formulaic. I find that terribly disappointing.

Though, honestly? Michelle Rodrigeuz's Trudy Chacon almost made the whole thing worth it. Can we have a movie just about her please? Add her to the stack of awesome women sacrificed to plot convenience.

Blerg.
ziparumpazoo: Tree covered in pink frost (C4)

[personal profile] ziparumpazoo 2009-12-21 02:04 am (UTC)(link)
Is this movie really anything more than revisionist, apologetic rewriting of history?

Actually, I was under the impression it was a two hour commercial for a video game. I saw copies in the store before the movie was even released.
(ok, I may be totally off the mark on that one, but I tend to measure movie promotional budgets by the number of Happy Meal toys that I end up recycling - the more toys I toss, the crapier the movie. It seems like the promotions for Avatar never end. ;p )

[identity profile] annerbhp.livejournal.com 2009-12-21 03:37 am (UTC)(link)
Snerk. Yes. Usually the more horridly over-advertised something is, the more it sucks.

[identity profile] shutthef-up.livejournal.com 2009-12-21 02:17 am (UTC)(link)
Thank you for such a neat analysis of the movie! Very deep and interesting.

I don't generally go to movies anymore so it's unlikely I'd go see it but the things that pinged you would also ping me.
Especially the anti-tech/noble savage dichotomy.

Thanks again!

[identity profile] annerbhp.livejournal.com 2009-12-21 06:06 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I so rarely go to movies anymore myself. I think my friends are getting tired of my take on these films. Lol. "Can't you just enjoy the movie without analyzing it to bits?!" Me: "Highly unlikely."

[identity profile] sulien77.livejournal.com 2009-12-21 02:37 am (UTC)(link)
It sounds to me like this could have been written by the boys over at Bridge Studios. :-p Thank you kindly for sharing this review, I'll not bother with this movie until it's available to rent (if I bother with it then).

[identity profile] annerbhp.livejournal.com 2009-12-21 06:06 am (UTC)(link)
Snerk. Yeah, I'd rent for Trudy. She was awesome. :D
ext_18106: (Default)

[identity profile] lyssie.livejournal.com 2009-12-21 03:00 am (UTC)(link)
Somehow, none of this surprises me.

[identity profile] annerbhp.livejournal.com 2009-12-21 06:06 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, me neither. And yet, still disappointed.
ext_2131: picture of a fish with lots of green (Default)

[identity profile] holdouttrout.livejournal.com 2009-12-21 08:47 pm (UTC)(link)
*sighs* I have a few people REALLY EXCITED about this movie in my life. I am trying to explain why I don't think it's going to be all that. But. Yeah. (It's kinda like talking to New Star Trek people about why I came away underwhelmed. It doesn't really impact them and just makes me look like the humorless feminist/bad guy/whatever.)

[identity profile] annerbhp.livejournal.com 2009-12-22 06:42 am (UTC)(link)
I think that's why it was such a disappointment. Everyone is going off about how *innovative* and *groundbreaking* this movie is and I'm like, other than a fancy camera and some amazing graphics you are the OPPOSITE of innovative or groundbreaking. Trite and tire more like it. And I know tons of people will like this movie and never give it a second though, but I'm just not wired that way. I critique therefore I am. Blerg.